Stewarded in the open
Three independent stewards, a published review path, a public correction log and a right of reply for every country.
Three independent stewards
The Nexus Consortium is stewarded by three independent not-for-profit institutions: The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation (GCRI), through GCRI US in Washington, DC and GCRI Canada in Ontario, with GCRI Canada as Lead Institution, Consortium Secretariat and lead contracting organisation; The Global Risks Forum (GRF); and The Global Risks Alliance (GRA). Technology, infrastructure and service providers work with the Consortium at arm’s length under written agreements, like every other external party in the public-private-planet model, and hold no role in its stewardship.
GCRI Canada
شواهد، روشها، هستانشناسی ریسک، انضباط داده، سوابق راستیآزماییپذیر و اصلاح.
Global Risks Forum
رهبری، گفتوگوی نهادی و تولیت Nexus Universe. دروازههای برنامه از G0 تا G7 را ثبت میکند.
Global Risks Alliance
آمادگی مالی، بیمه و توسعه. شواهد ریسک به مادهٔ بررسی دقیق بدل میشوند، هرگز به تأیید یا معامله.
Review and release
Each edition passes method review, data and licence review, the public-safe screen and steward review; an independent statistical audit reviews each major methodology version.
Review gates in the release workflow
The audit and steward gates hold the run until the named reviewers record a disposition.
Edition release: review gates
End to end on the longest path: about 20.9 d of proposed target service levels. Gates wait for the people named; bars with a fading end have no fixed length.
-
Evidence cut frozenCut · NXS-GRX run service · 1 hourInput vintages pinnedسرویس اجرای NXS-GRXدفتر PostgreSQL (امنیت سطح ردیف)
-
دروازهٔ پروانهIngest · Licence register · 1 hourAdmitted, isolated or withheldفهرست پروانهها
-
Harmonise matrix · 150 sourcesIngest · NXS-GRX run service · 6 hoursUnits, areas, timeسرویس اجرای NXS-GRXاستاندارد نشانگر
-
Indicators matrix · 451 × 195Indicators · NXS-GRX run service · 4 hoursDerivations, flagged imputationسرویس اجرای NXS-GRXاستاندارد نشانگر
-
Sub-indices matrix · 86Indices · NXS-GRX run service · 1 hourNormalise, weight, aggregateسرویس اجرای NXS-GRXهستههای مدل آزموده
-
Domain indices matrix · 20Indices · NXS-GRX run service · 1 hourTwenty domain indicesسرویس اجرای NXS-GRXهستههای مدل آزموده
-
Coupling scoreIndices · NXS-GRX run service · 2 hoursDebtRank, clearing, cascadesشبکهٔ وابستگیهستههای مدل آزموده
-
1,000 Monte Carlo draws matrix · 1,000Uncertainty · Monte Carlo engine · 3 hoursWeights, normalisation, aggregation, imputationموتور مونتکارلو
-
Intervals, classes, SobolUncertainty · Monte Carlo engine · 1 hour90% intervals · Class probabilities · Sensitivityموتور مونتکارلو
-
Statistical audit approvalReview · Independent reviewer · 10 daysCoherence, stabilityهستههای مدل آزموده
-
Steward review approvalReview · Stewards · 10 daysMethod, evidence, public-safe screenدفتر PostgreSQL (امنیت سطح ردیف)
-
Profiles and series matrix · 195 + 59Publish · Foundry · 2 hoursPublished with intervalsPublic cut APINS-1 UNI catalogue
-
Tiles and bulk filesPublish · Foundry · 2 hoursISO3, ADM1, ADM2, H3 · Deposit with DOIVector tilesZenodo deposit
| فراورده | کار | چه کسی | مرحله |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cut record | Evidence cut frozen | سرویس اجرای NXS-GRX | Cut |
| Withheld counts | دروازهٔ پروانه | فهرست پروانهها | Ingest |
| HAR series | Harmonise | سرویس اجرای NXS-GRX | Ingest |
| IND values | شاخصها | سرویس اجرای NXS-GRX | شاخصها |
| SUB values | Sub-indices | سرویس اجرای NXS-GRX | شاخصها |
| IDX values | شاخصهای حوزه | سرویس اجرای NXS-GRX | شاخصها |
| S per country | Coupling score | سرویس اجرای NXS-GRX | شاخصها |
| Draw set with seed | 1,000 Monte Carlo draws | موتور مونتکارلو | عدم قطعیت |
| Uncertainty report | Intervals, classes, Sobol | موتور مونتکارلو | عدم قطعیت |
| Audit note | Statistical audit | Independent reviewer | بازبینی |
| Release decision | Steward review | متولیان | بازبینی |
| ویراست | Profiles and series | Foundry | انتشار |
| Tiles | Tiles and bulk files | Foundry | انتشار |
| DOI | Tiles and bulk files | Foundry | انتشار |
Integrity rules
Declared interests
Conflict-of-interest declarations for every reviewer and contributor of values.
No outside edits
No party, funder or provider can change a value outside the published method and correction process.
حق پاسخ
Country right of reply and a public correction log.
Do no harm
Sensitive outputs (conflict, famine, biosecurity) pass a do-no-harm screen; publication can be delayed or generalised where detail could cause harm.
Replication
Methods, seeds and digests published for replication.
اطلاعات، نه اقتدار
NXS-GRX makes risk visible without making it officially rated; makes disaster risk reduction actionable for learning without issuing commands; makes disaster risk finance questions readable without creating finance or insurance execution; makes intelligence useful without creating public warnings; and makes frontier technology risks structured without certifying anything.
Benchmark principles, applied voluntarily
The index is not a regulated financial benchmark. It applies the IOSCO Principles for Financial Benchmarks (2013) voluntarily, because people use risk indices to make financial decisions.
| منطقه | Principle | How the index meets it | وضعیت |
|---|---|---|---|
| حکمرانی | 1 · Overall responsibility | The three stewards hold responsibility for every stage, from evidence cut to correction; GCRI acts as Lead Institution and Consortium Secretariat. | In place |
| حکمرانی | 2 · Oversight of third parties | Technology, infrastructure and service providers act at arm’s length and cannot change a value outside the published method. | In place |
| حکمرانی | 3 · Conflicts of interest | Reviewers and contributors declare interests; funders and providers have no role in determinations. A public register of declarations opens with the first edition. | Designed |
| حکمرانی | 4 · Control framework | Each edition runs as a workflow with method, data, licence, public-safe and steward gates that hold the run until a named reviewer records a disposition. | In place |
| حکمرانی | 5 · Internal oversight | Steward review of every edition; an independent statistical audit of each major method version, its auditor to be appointed. | Stewards to decide |
| Quality of the index | 6 · Design | The method documents what each index measures, its polarity, aggregation and limits, with intervals instead of league tables. | In place |
| Quality of the index | 7 · Data sufficiency | Coverage thresholds per value, imputation flagged and capped, withheld values counted and stated. | In place |
| Quality of the index | 8 · Hierarchy of inputs | Registered sources only, each admitted on its own licence; official statistics first, then peer-reviewed and open research products, each labelled. | In place |
| Quality of the index | 9 · Transparency of determinations | Every value opens to its indicators, sources, method version and correction log. | In place |
| Quality of the index | 10 · Periodic review | An annual method review with an open consultation; every comment receives a disposition. | Designed |
| Quality of the method | 11 · Content of the method | The full method is published: construction steps, aggregation, imputation, classes, uncertainty and validation. | In place |
| Quality of the method | 12 · Changes to the method | Proposal, public consultation of at least 30 days, disposition, semantic version and notice before the change takes effect. | Designed |
| Quality of the method | 13 · Transition and cessation | A discontinued indicator or series is announced with its replacement, overlap period and back-cast where inputs allow. | Designed |
| Quality of the method | 14 · Contributor code of conduct | Contributions arrive through structured forms with licence, provenance and declarations; contributors keep their rights. | In place |
| Quality of the method | 15 · Controls over data collection | Licence gate, provenance on every record, frozen inputs per vintage and build checks that fail on drift. | In place |
| پاسخگویی | 16 · Complaints | Right of reply and correction requests through a public form, acknowledged, reviewed and published with their effect on any value. | In place |
| پاسخگویی | 17 · Audits | External audit of the method and its application, scope and auditor to be decided by the stewards. | Stewards to decide |
| پاسخگویی | 18 · Audit trail | Vintages, provenance, the release workflow record and the correction log are kept for every edition. | In place |
| پاسخگویی | 19 · Cooperation with authorities | The index is not a regulated benchmark; records are available to competent authorities on request. | In place |
Policies a user of the index can rely on
Conflicts of interest
Every reviewer, contributor of values and working-group member declares funding, employment and holdings. A declared conflict excludes that person from the determination it touches.
Complaints and right of reply
Anyone can ask for a correction, and a national authority can file a reply, through the form on this page. Each request is acknowledged, reviewed in public and published with its outcome.
Revisions and restatements
Values are never revised silently. A correction creates a new vintage, states what changed and why, and keeps the earlier vintage retrievable.
Method changes
A change is proposed, consulted on for at least 30 days, answered, versioned and announced before it takes effect, with a back-cast where inputs allow.
Transition and cessation
An indicator or series that has to stop is announced with its replacement and an overlap period, so users can move without a break.
Use in decisions and contracts
The index informs judgement; it is not investment advice and not intended as a reference rate in contracts. Users remain responsible for how they use it.
استفاده از هوش مصنوعی
AI assists drafting, coding and quality checks; every published value is computed by declared kernels from governed inputs, and AI-assisted text is reviewed and disclosed. No value is generated by a language model.
Right of reply and correction request
A national authority, institution or person concerned asks for a correction or files a reply; it is reviewed in public and recorded with its effect on any value.
- 01پر کنیدپر کردن فیلدهای دارای نشان (الزامی) لازم است؛ بقیهٔ موارد به بررسی کمک میکنند.
- 02مرجعیک شمارهٔ مرجع روی صفحه دریافت میکنید؛ این سابقه در پایگاه دادهٔ WordPress همین سایت نگه داشته میشود.
- 03بازبینینتیجه بهطور عمومی ثبت میشود. اطلاعات تماس در همین سایت میماند و هرگز منتشر یا همرسانی نمیشود.
این فرم پس از فعال شدن در همینجا باز میشود. تا آن زمان، آن را از راه درگاه Nexus Reports.
گزارش خطا
Every correction is reviewed in public and logged with its effect on each value.
وضعیت
روششناسی، ساختار و تعاریف The Global Risks Index پیشنویس کاری مقدماتی (2026) است که برای بررسی و اظهارنظر منتشر شده و برای اجرا نیست. هیچ مقداری نمایش داده نمیشود تا ویراستی از یک برش شواهد تحت حکمرانی منتشر شود؛ آنگاه مقادیر همراه با بازهها، ردهها، منابع و مسیر اصلاح خود ارائه میشوند. شبیهسازها روشهای منتشرشده را بر روی اعدادی که شما برمیگزینید اجرا میکنند و هرگز مقداری از NXS-GRX نشان نمیدهند.
آنچه NXS-GRX نیست
NXS-GRX اطلاعات پژوهشی و تحلیلی ریسک است. رتبهبندی اعتباری یا ESG نیست و از هیچ مقیاس رتبهبندی استفاده نمیکند، شاخص مرجع ابزارهای مالی نیست، آمار رسمی نیست، هشدار اضطراری یا طبقهبندی رسمی نیست و توصیه نیست. نباید برای ارزیابی اشخاص حقیقی به کار رود. طبقههای ریسک بازههایی روی یک مقیاس منتشرشدهاند، هرگز رتبهبندی کشورها یا افراد نیستند.
نهادها و منابع
The Nexus Consortium is stewarded by three independent not-for-profit institutions: The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation (GCRI), through GCRI US in Washington, DC and GCRI Canada in Ontario, with GCRI Canada as Lead Institution, Consortium Secretariat and lead contracting organisation; The Global Risks Forum (GRF); and The Global Risks Alliance (GRA). Technology, infrastructure and service providers work with the Consortium at arm’s length under written agreements, like every other external party in the public-private-planet model, and hold no role in its stewardship.
هر مقدار انتساب منابع خود را در بر دارد و آن منابع پروانههای خود را حفظ میکنند. نامهای بیرونی تنها برای میانکنشپذیری ذکر میشوند. متون نگاشتهٔ Nexus برای انتشار با پروانهٔ CC BY 4.0 در نظر گرفته شدهاند.
Avis en français
La méthodologie et les définitions du NXS-GRX sont un projet de travail préparatoire (2026). Le NXS-GRX est une information de recherche et d’analyse des risques : ni notation, ni indice de référence financier, ni statistique officielle, ni alerte, ni conseil. Les classes de risque sont des bandes sur une échelle publiée, non des classements.