What NXS-GRX is
The open, multi-domain index family that reads hazard, vulnerability, macro-financial fragility, coping capacity and systemic coupling for every country, with intervals, sources and corrections on every value.
A family of indices, not one monolithic score
NXS-GRX (canonical data, provenance and risk) publishes twenty domain indices, four pillar indices, a composite and six instruments. The composite never appears without every pillar and domain beside it, and no independent dimension is collapsed silently.
Classes with intervals, never league tables
Every value carries a 90% interval from Monte Carlo analysis over normalisation, weights, imputation and aggregation. Countries are placed in risk classes with a stated class probability; pages list countries by name or code, never by value.
No data is not zero
A missing input is shown as missing, an imputed input is flagged, and a value is withheld when coverage falls below the method's minimum. An empty profile, an unavailable source and an observed zero render differently.
Every value resolves to its source
Each value carries its source release, licence, retrieval time, method version and transformation chain (W3C PROV). A correction anywhere propagates to every dependent value and is logged publicly.
Measured, modelled and perceived are kept apart
Status glyphs separate observed, reported, estimated, inferred, forecast, simulated, scenario and expert input. Perception signals form their own instrument and are never blended into measured risk.
Systemic by construction
Standalone risk and coupling-adjusted risk are reported side by side, from typed dependency networks across trade, finance, energy, food, infrastructure and information.
Licence-gated and reproducible
A source enters a public value only when its licence admits that use; withheld values are counted, not hidden. Methods, code paths, seeds and digests are published per release so any value can be recomputed.
Information, not authority
NXS-GRX is research and risk-analytics information. It is not a rating, an official classification, a warning, a benchmark or advice, and it never decides for an institution.
The world board
Composite, coupled composite and the four pillars for the world, with change, interval, class probability and trend, and the countries that moved most.
| Instrument | Value | Change | Change % | 90% interval | Class · probability | Trend | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NXS-GRX Composite RiskNXS-GRX · CRI | — | — | — | — | — | ||
| NXS-GRX Coupled RiskNXS-GRX · CPL | — | — | — | — | — | ||
| Hazard and threat exposureNXS-GRX · HTE | — | — | — | — | — | ||
| Human and systems vulnerabilityNXS-GRX · VUL | — | — | — | — | — | ||
| Macro-financial and structural fragilityNXS-GRX · MSF | — | — | — | — | — | ||
| Lack of coping and adaptive capacityNXS-GRX · LCC | — | — | — | — | — |
Your watchlist
Why a new index
Established indices each read part of risk well. None reads all of it on one grammar with uncertainty, systemic coupling, forecasts, scenarios and provenance on every value.
| Gap in the current landscape | What NXS-GRX does |
|---|---|
| No index unifies hazard, vulnerability, conflict, macro-finance, cyber, health, food, nature and technology in one structure | Twenty index domain indices in four pillars, one grammar |
| Systemic and cascading risk is described, not modelled | Coupling instrument: typed dependency networks, contagion models, coupled beside standalone composite |
| Subnational coverage is thin and not comparable | ADM1, ADM2 and one H3 fabric for hazard, exposure and capacity |
| Uncertainty is rarely reported; ranks are over-read | 90% intervals, class probabilities and Sobol sensitivity on every value; no league tables |
| Data lags one to three years | Pulse instrument: weekly nowcast over admitted event streams |
| Few indices forecast or are back-tested | Outlook instrument with published verification scorecards |
| Scenario projections are rare and macro-only | Pathways instrument: SSP × warming level and transition families to 2030, 2050 and 2100 |
| Perceived and measured risk are blurred | Perception instrument kept separate, with a published gap |
| Values rarely trace to sources, versions and licences | Record-level provenance, licence gate, public correction log |
| Machine access is weak (PDF and spreadsheet releases) | API, SDMX keys, vector tiles, bulk files and versioned releases |
| Licence restrictions block derived reuse | Per-source licence gate; withheld values counted |
| Coverage gaps cluster in fragile and small-island states | Coverage vector per country; imputation flagged and capped |
| Capacity on paper is mistaken for performance | Capability ladder from listed to demonstrated in real events |
| Methods change and break comparability | Semantic versions, back-cast series, digests per release |
| Neglected domains: AI, space weather, biosecurity, minerals, digital infrastructure, tail risk | Exponential technology and strategic systems series; Tail instrument |
| No shared taxonomy across indices | hazards with HIPs crosswalks; indicators with 501 crosswalks to source code lists |
| Means hide fat tails | Exceedance curves, return-period losses and expected shortfall where loss can be modelled |
From source to profile
Indicators become sub-indices, twenty domain indices, four pillars and the composite; seven instruments read the same evidence for different questions.
- Event streamsSOURCES · SOURCES · near real timeAdmitted alert, Earth-observation, conflict-event, price and market streams for the Pulse instrument.
- 208 registered sourcesSOURCES · SOURCES · licence-gatedEvery source is registered with its licence; nothing enters a public value its licence does not admit.
- Scenario familiesSOURCES · SOURCES · labelledSocio-economic and warming pathways and transition families, used as labelled scenario structures.
- Surveys and elicitationSOURCES · SOURCES · perceptionStructured expert elicitation and public surveys, kept apart from measured risk.
- Dependency networkNETWORK · NETWORK · six layersTrade and input–output, finance and debt, energy, food trade, infrastructure and information links.
- Harmonised seriesHAR · HAR · units, areas, timeSource series mapped to Nexus concepts and code lists; units, areas and frequency aligned; no imputation.
- 451 indicatorsIND · IND · Indicator StandardNative indicators with definitions, units, polarity, levels and crosswalks; flagged imputation only here.
- 86 sub-indicesSUB · SUB · normalisedNormalised, weighted and aggregated components inside each domain.
- 20 domain indicesIDX · IDX · 1,000 drawsTwenty domain indices with Monte Carlo intervals and sensitivity.
- Systemic coupling scoreCOUPLING · COUPLING · SContagion on the dependency network: DebtRank, clearing and threshold cascades.
- Hazard and threat exposurePILLAR · PILLAR · HTEWhat can strike, how often, how hard and who and what stands in its way?
- Human and systems vulnerabilityPILLAR · PILLAR · VULHow susceptible are people, livelihoods, ecosystems and essential systems to harm when a shock arrives?
- Macro-financial and structural fragilityPILLAR · PILLAR · MSFHow much fiscal, financial, external, digital and technological room does the system have before stress turns into crisis?
- Lack of coping and adaptive capacityPILLAR · PILLAR · LCCCan institutions anticipate, absorb, respond, recover and adapt?
- PulseINSTRUMENT · INSTRUMENT · weeklyNowcast anomaly against each country's own history.
- OutlookINSTRUMENT · INSTRUMENT · 1 to 36 monthsCalibrated event probabilities with verification scorecards.
- TailINSTRUMENT · INSTRUMENT · exceedanceExceedance curves, return-period losses, catastrophic register.
- PathwaysINSTRUMENT · INSTRUMENT · to 2100Fan charts under named scenario families.
- PerceptionINSTRUMENT · INSTRUMENT · separatePerceived severity and the perception gap.
- NXS-GRX Composite RiskCOMPOSITE · COMPOSITE · geometricComposite = (HTE × VUL × MSF × LCC)^(1/4), each pillar on 0–10 floored at 0.1; pillar = expert-weighted geometric mean of its domain indices
- 195 country profilesPROFILES · PROFILES · classes, intervalsEvery domain, pillar and instrument per country, never ranked.
- 54 series indicesSERIES · SERIES · global to technologySpecialised indices from the same domain indices.
- API, tiles and bulk filesACCESS · ACCESS · machinePublic cut, SDMX keys, vector tiles, bulk files.
- NXS-GRX Coupled RiskCOMPOSITE · COMPOSITE · × (1 + κ·S)Coupled = Composite × (1 + κ·S), S = systemic coupling score in [0,1] from the dependency network, κ disclosed per release (baseline κ = 0.25); reported beside the standalone composite, never instead of it
Every action is a run you can follow
Build, model, test, deploy, scale and monitor: each journey names who acts at each job, the technology it runs on, the checks it must pass and the gates where it waits for review.
End to end on the longest path: about 5.1 d of proposed target service levels. Gates wait for the people named; bars with a fading end have no fixed length.
- Define scope and questionScope · You · instantEntities: countries, ADM areas, sites or assets · Question and decision the index serves · Risk-chain components to coverIndex Studio
- Select indicatorsScope · You · self-serveSearch 451 indicator definitions · Add your own indicators · Polarity and unit checkedIndex Studioindicator standard
- Licence and coverage gate approvalData · NXS-GRX run service · automaticEach input's licence checked for the use · Coverage per entity measured · Gaps flagged, never zero-filledLicence registerPostgreSQL ledger (row-level security)
- Harmonise and impute matrix · indicators × entitiesData · NXS-GRX run service · 1 hourUnits and periods aligned · Flagged imputation only at indicator levelNXS-GRX run serviceindicator standard
- Normalise, weight and aggregateConstruct · You · self-serveNormalisation per indicator · Expert or statistical weights · Geometric, arithmetic or penalised aggregationIndex StudioTested model kernels
- Uncertainty: 1,000 draws matrix · 1,000 drawsConstruct · Monte Carlo engine · 1 hourWeights, normalisation and imputation varied · 90% intervals and class probabilitiesMonte Carlo engine
- Validation suiteTest · NXS-GRX run service · 1 hourInternal coherence · Sensitivity (Sobol) · Correlation with established indices · Leave-one-out stabilityVerification engineTested model kernels
- Method review approvalTest · Index editors · 5 daysMethod and tests reviewed · Disposition recordedPostgreSQL ledger (row-level security)
- Publish to your tenantShip · NXS-GRX Platform · instantAPI endpoint and tiles · Dashboard and embeds · Model cardPrivate tenant (row-level security)Public cut APIVector tiles
| Artifact | Job | Who | Stage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Studio project | Define scope and question | You | Scope |
| Indicator set | Select indicators | You | Scope |
| Coverage report | Licence and coverage gate | NXS-GRX run service | Data |
| Harmonised panel | Harmonise and impute | NXS-GRX run service | Data |
| Method record | Normalise, weight and aggregate | You | Construct |
| Draws file with seed | Uncertainty: 1,000 draws | Monte Carlo engine | Construct |
| Validation report | Validation suite | NXS-GRX run service | Test |
| Review note | Method review | Index editors | Test |
| Index endpoint | Publish to your tenant | NXS-GRX Platform | Ship |
| Model card | Publish to your tenant | NXS-GRX Platform | Ship |
Four pillars, one composite, never alone
Composite = (HTE × VUL × MSF × LCC)^(1/4), each pillar on 0–10 floored at 0.1; pillar = expert-weighted geometric mean of its domain indices
Hazard and threat exposure
What can strike, how often, how hard and who and what stands in its way? 5 domain indices.
IndicesVULHuman and systems vulnerability
How susceptible are people, livelihoods, ecosystems and essential systems to harm when a shock arrives? 8 domain indices.
IndicesMSFMacro-financial and structural fragility
How much fiscal, financial, external, digital and technological room does the system have before stress turns into crisis? 5 domain indices.
IndicesLCCLack of coping and adaptive capacity
Can institutions anticipate, absorb, respond, recover and adapt? 2 domain indices.
IndicesSeven instruments, seven questions
Structural
What is the slow-moving baseline of risk? ESTIMATEDMODELLED
MethodWeekly nowcast, event-driven between releasesPulse
What has changed since the last structural cut? OBSERVEDINFERRED
MethodMonthly, horizons of 1, 3, 12 and 36 monthsOutlook
How likely are defined adverse outcomes over a stated horizon? FORECAST
MethodEach annual editionPathways
How does risk move under alternative futures to 2030, 2050 and 2100? SCENARIOSIMULATED
MethodEach annual edition, event-updatedTail
What does the rare, severe end of the distribution look like? SIMULATEDMODELLED
MethodEach annual edition, quarterly network refreshCoupling
Where does risk travel across systems and borders? ESTIMATEDSIMULATED
MethodAnnual expert and public survey wavesPerception
Where does perceived risk differ from measured risk? EXPERT INPUTREPORTED
MethodGlobal, sector, strategic, technology, thematic and regional
Global series
The world read as one interdependent system. 1 series.
OpenGSGlobal sector series
Fifteen sector indices on the grammar of the Nexus Reports sector screen. 15 series.
OpenSRStrategic systems series
Cross-cutting systems where crises entangle. 14 series.
OpenXTExponential technology series
Frontier technologies as infrastructure, dependency and hazard. 20 series.
OpenTHThematic series
Disaster risk reduction, finance and intelligence, and the water, energy, food, health and biodiversity nexus. 4 series.
OpenRGRegional series
The five UN M49 regions and their twenty-two sub-regions. 5 regions.
OpenHow to read NXS-GRX
Classes, not ranks
A class is printed with its probability (share of Monte Carlo draws inside the class). Below 60% the adjacent class is printed too (for example High, 54% · Very high, 41%).
The status of every value
| Glyph | Status | Means |
|---|---|---|
| ● | OBSERVED | Measured directly and published by the source |
| □ | REPORTED | Reported or declared by a publisher, not independently measured |
| ◆ | ESTIMATED | Estimated or modelled by a stated method |
| ▲ | INFERRED | Inferred from related signals |
| ◇ | FORECAST | Probabilistic statement about a future period |
| ◈ | SIMULATED | Output of a simulation or stochastic event set |
| ○ | SCENARIO | Conditional on a named scenario, not a prediction |
| ◎ | EXPERT INPUT | Structured expert judgement |
When there is no value
| State | Means |
|---|---|
PUBLISHED | Released in an edition with interval, class and sources |
NO_DATA | No admitted input; not a zero |
INSUFFICIENT_EVIDENCE | Coverage below the method minimum; value withheld |
WITHHELD | An input's licence or the public-safe screen does not admit public display; counted |
DEGRADED | Published with a stated quality limitation |
Who it serves
Governments and national risk agencies
Prioritise prevention and preparedness; Plan with subnational layers; Track Sendai targets; Co-develop a national index
International financial institutions and development banks
Screen country and project context; Read fiscal resilience and protection gaps; Design pre-arranged finance questions
UN system and humanitarian organisations
Compare needs across contexts with intervals; Watch weekly signals for review; Read outlooks for anticipatory planning
Insurers, reinsurers and risk pools
Read hazard, exposure and protection-gap context; Run scenario and tail analytics; Study parametric index design questions
Banks, asset managers and sovereign investors
Read sovereign and systemic context; Run climate pathway packs; Build portfolio postures
Regulators, supervisors and central banks
Design supervisory scenarios; Read systemic coupling; Replicate methods
Companies and supply chains
Screen sites and suppliers; Watch chokepoints and pulse; Read country context
Civil society and NGOs
Target programmes; Use open profiles; Contribute local evidence
Universities and research
Replicate every value; Study methods; Contribute data and review
Media
Explain risk with intervals and classes; Embed charts and maps with attribution
Citizens and communities
Read the risk context of a place; Understand what the numbers mean and do not mean
Three independent stewards, three lenses
GCRI Canada leads the public-good Nexus Consortium as Lead Institution, Consortium Secretariat and lead contracting organization. GRF and GRA retain independent institutional mandates as consortium stewards. Technology, infrastructure and service providers act at arm's length and have no control over institutional governance, research, publications, national priorities or customer, sovereign and community data.
GCRI Canada
Evidence, methods, risk ontology, data discipline, verifiable records and correction.
The Global Risks Forum
Public-good legitimacy, claims discipline, public-safe risk reporting and stakeholder formation.
The Global Risks Alliance
Readiness literacy, capital-readability, insurance-readiness and disaster-risk-finance questions, without advice.
Evidence cuts
An edition is published after review, not to a calendar; the dates are evidence cuts.