Skip to content
Colour mode
GRIx home

Nexus Reports

Reviewer Charter and Confidentiality Agreement

ReportsThe Global Risks Index (NXS-GRX)Charters
Charter · version 0.1.0

Reviewer Charter and Confidentiality Agreement

Reviewers declare conflicts, keep manuscripts confidential, never upload them to AI tools, review on time and write constructive reports.

Reviewer Charter and Confidentiality AgreementCharters
  1. Version0.1.0
  2. StatusDraft pending owner and counsel review
  3. EffectiveOn adoption by the owner through nexus-governance
  4. Applies toreviewer, steward-reviewer on all networks
  5. Text hash (sha256)8d2d2ad766e4779f…
  6. JurisdictionProposal: the laws of the Province of Ontario and the federal laws of Canada applicable therein; default forum the courts of Ontario sitting in Toronto; mandatory local law is not excluded.

Reports · the Global Centre for Risk and Innovation (GCRI Canada), publisher of record

01Status

Draft. Not in force.

This document is a draft. It is not legal advice and it is not in force. It becomes required only when the owner adopts it by a recorded decision in nexus-governance. Until then nothing here blocks anyone’s work.

02Charter

Conflicts of interest

I declare conflicts before I read a submission. I decline if I am an author, coauthor, colleague at the same institution, have a close personal or financial relationship, or compete directly with the work. If I discover a conflict later I tell the editor at once.

03Charter

Confidentiality

The manuscript, data, reports and the editorial discussion are confidential. I do not share, use or cite them. I do not contact the authors. I delete my copies when the review ends unless the editor asks otherwise.

04Charter

No AI upload of manuscripts

I do not upload manuscripts, data or my report drafts to any AI tool or service that stores, shares or trains on them. I do not use AI to write my review. I may use a local tool that sends nothing off my device for language checks only, and I say so to the editor.

05Charter

Timeliness

I answer the invitation within 2 days. I deliver the review within the period the editor sets (the policy is 28 days for reviews). If I cannot, I say so early.

06Charter

Constructive reports

I judge the work on evidence, method and clarity, not on the authors. I give specific, respectful and actionable comments. I separate what must change from what I suggest. I do not demand citation of my own work without reason. Authors see every report. I may choose to sign. Notes become public after the decision as the Peer Review Policy states.

07Charter

Integrity

I report suspected misconduct to the editor, not to the authors. AI cannot be a reviewer of record. I am a named, accountable person.

08Charter

Record

My acceptance is recorded in the acceptance ledger. It is an acceptance record by my signed-in account, not a qualified electronic signature. I renew it each year and when the charter changes.

09Charter

Governing law (proposal)

The laws of Ontario and the federal laws of Canada applicable therein. Counsel to confirm.

CC BY 4.0 Free to read. Text and figures: CC BY 4.0. Data: CC0 1.0. Authors keep copyright. Published by GCRI Canada.