Vitebsk
First-level unit, Belarus: people, area, the units inside and neighbours, with risk values when released.
Inside Vitebsk
The 21 ADM2 units of Vitebsk.
People, area and density
Source observations from open grids summed inside the boundary; not index values.
1,200,357
12.7% of Belarus.
1,053,693
-12% against GHSL; the two grids differ in method.
40,171 km²
30 people per km².
BY-VI
Subdivision code as carried by the boundary source.
21 units inside Vitebsk
Each unit has its own page.
Boundary licences: Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License
| Unit | Code | People (GHSL) | People (WorldPop) | Area km² | Per km² | Share | Coast ≤ 10 m |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beshankovichy | – | 14,068 | 12,029 | 1,218.33 | 12 | 1.2% | 0 |
| Braslaw | – | 22,788 | 22,447 | 2,284.82 | 10 | 1.9% | 0 |
| Chashniki | – | 27,218 | 25,618 | 1,460.17 | 19 | 2.3% | 0 |
| Dokshytsy | – | 20,611 | 19,832 | 2,245.54 | 9 | 1.7% | 0 |
| Dubrowna | – | 13,525 | 13,800 | 1,230.45 | 11 | 1.1% | 0 |
| Haradok | – | 20,309 | 20,354 | 3,034.55 | 7 | 1.7% | 0 |
| Hlybokaye | – | 31,701 | 31,714 | 1,755.72 | 18 | 2.6% | 0 |
| Liozna | – | 13,341 | 14,227 | 1,371.86 | 10 | 1.1% | 0 |
| Lyepyel | – | 27,260 | 29,331 | 1,871.91 | 15 | 2.3% | 0 |
| Miory | – | 17,140 | 14,888 | 1,789.29 | 10 | 1.4% | 0 |
| Orsha | – | 128,505 | 135,544 | 1,725.31 | 74 | 10.7% | 0 |
| Pastavy | – | 30,755 | 31,255 | 2,138.66 | 14 | 2.6% | 0 |
| Polotsk | – | 265,006 | 190,400 | 3,229.77 | 82 | 22.1% | 0 |
| Rasony | – | 8,504 | 7,922 | 1,940.78 | 4 | 0.7% | 0 |
| Sharkawshchyna | – | 13,938 | 12,169 | 1,193.31 | 12 | 1.2% | 0 |
| Shumilina | – | 14,997 | 15,690 | 1,757.36 | 9 | 1.2% | 0 |
| Syanno | – | 20,151 | 17,845 | 1,955.06 | 10 | 1.7% | 0 |
| Talachyn | – | 21,099 | 21,054 | 1,496.74 | 14 | 1.8% | 0 |
| Ushachy | – | 11,174 | 10,253 | 1,477.33 | 8 | 0.9% | 0 |
| Verkhnyadzvinsk | – | 20,174 | 19,426 | 2,191.96 | 9 | 1.7% | 0 |
| Vitebsk | – | 458,093 | 387,894 | 2,802.35 | 163 | 38.2% | 0 |
Open exposure layers
Count of H3 resolution-3 cells whose centre falls in the unit and that carry each Natural Earth layer.
- Urban areas
- 183.2 H3 cells
- Amachweba
- None at this resolution
- Izikhumulo zezindiza
- None at this resolution
- Major roads
- 1,229.4 H3 cells
- Ojantshi
- 1,189.9 H3 cells
- Rivers and lakes
- 402.9 H3 cells
Risk values
Sources, credits and licences
- ADM1 boundaries
- geoBoundaries (William & Mary geoLab), gbOpen BLR ADM1, source: geoBoundaries, CIESIN, licence: Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License · source · represents 2005
- ADM2 boundaries
- geoBoundaries (William & Mary geoLab), gbOpen BLR ADM2, source: geoBoundaries, CIESIN, licence: Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License · source · represents 2005
- Basemap
- OpenFreeMap © OpenMapTiles (CC BY 4.0) · data © OpenStreetMap contributors (ODbL 1.0). Vector tiles requested by the reader’s browser, unmodified; the map falls back to plain land and sea when the host does not answer.
- Terrain
- Terrain Tiles (Mapzen, AWS Open Data), compiled from SRTM and other public elevation sources (NASA, USGS, ETOPO1, GMTED, EU-DEM under the Copernicus programme, Geoscience Australia, Kartverket, INEGI, LINZ, data.gov.uk). Display relief, not survey data.
- People
- GHSL 2025 population grid, European Commission Joint Research Centre (CC BY 4.0), shown at 0.05° and summed per unit; WorldPop 2025 (CC BY 4.0) as a second estimate. Units smaller than a grid cell take the density of the cell under them.
- Amazwe
- Natural Earth (public domain).
- Elevation
- GEBCO Compilation Group (2024) GEBCO 2024 Grid (public domain), reduced to 0.05°: the share of each cell’s land at or below 10 m, weighted by GHSL 2025 people for the low coastal zone.
- Position
- Boundaries are shown for location only and take no position on any boundary, name or status.
Isimo
The methodology, structure and definitions of The Global Risks Index are a preparatory working draft (2026), circulated for review and comment and not for implementation. No value appears until an edition is released from a governed evidence cut; values then carry intervals, classes, sources and their correction pathway. Simulators run the published methods on numbers you choose and never show a NXS-GRX value.
A country profile reads public evidence about a place. It is not a statement by or about the policy of any government, takes no position on the status of any territory, and does not imply a national programme or participation. Names follow UN M49.
Lokho i-NXS-GRX engeyikho
I-NXS-GRX iwulwazi locwaningo nokuhlaziywa kobungozi. Akusona isilinganiso sesikweletu noma se-ESG futhi ayisebenzisi sikali sokulinganisa, akusona isilinganiso samathuluzi ezimali, akuzona izibalo ezisemthethweni, akusona isixwayiso esiphuthumayo noma ukuhlukaniswa okusemthethweni, futhi akusona iseluleko. Akumele isetshenziselwe ukuhlola abantu ngabanye. Izigaba zobungozi ziyimigoqo esikalini esishicilelwe, akukaze kube ukulandelana kwamazwe noma kwabantu.
Amasiginali e-Pulse namathuba okubikezela ayimininingwane yokubuyekezwa ngabaphathi abanegunya, akukaze kube izixwayiso zomphakathi; izixwayiso ezisemthethweni zivela kuphela kubaphathi abanegunya.
Izikhungo nemithombo
The Nexus Consortium is stewarded by three independent not-for-profit institutions: The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation (GCRI), through GCRI US in Washington, DC and GCRI Canada in Ontario, with GCRI Canada as Lead Institution, Consortium Secretariat and lead contracting organisation; The Global Risks Forum (GRF); and The Global Risks Alliance (GRA). Technology, infrastructure and service providers work with the Consortium at arm’s length under written agreements, like every other external party in the public-private-planet model, and hold no role in its stewardship.
Every value carries the attribution of its sources, which keep their own licences. External names are cited for interoperability only. Nexus-authored text is intended for CC BY 4.0 on release.
Avis en français
La méthodologie et les définitions du NXS-GRX sont un projet de travail préparatoire (2026). Le NXS-GRX est une information de recherche et d’analyse des risques : ni notation, ni indice de référence financier, ni statistique officielle, ni alerte, ni conseil. Les classes de risque sont des bandes sur une échelle publiée, non des classements.